NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Descent Mk3i 43mm vs Tactix 8 51mm AMOLED

Garmin Descent Mk3i 43mm vs Garmin Tactix 8 51mm AMOLED

What Descent Mk3i 43mm does better (4) and where Tactix 8 51mm AMOLED wins (7) — every spec side by side.

Garmin Descent Mk3i 43mm
Garmin · 2023Descent Mk3i 43mm
6.8Score
4 advantages≈ $1,400
vs
Garmin Tactix 8 51mm AMOLED
Garmin · 2025Tactix 8 51mm AMOLED
9.2Score
7 advantages≈ $1,400
Higher score
6.0Display7.5
3.4Battery life9.4
9.4Health tracking8.3
6.9Sports & outdoor9.3
6.5Smart features3.2
9.7Build & durability6.4
Dimensions

Size comparison

Descent Mk3i 43mmTactix 8 51mm AMOLED
43 × 4314.351 × 5114.7
Descent Mk3i 43mmTactix 8 51mm AMOLEDDifference
Height43 mm51 mm−8 mm
Width43 mm51 mm−8 mm
Thickness14.3 mm14.7 mm−0.4 mm
Weight49 g92 g−43 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Descent Mk3i 43mm better than Tactix 8 51mm AMOLED?

  1. Water resistance20 ATM vs 10 ATM2×
  2. Weight49.3 g vs 92 g+87%
  3. Rated dive depth200 m vs 40 m5×
  4. Thickness14.3 mm vs 14.7 mm+3%

Why is Tactix 8 51mm AMOLED better than Descent Mk3i 43mm?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)10 days vs 29 days2.9×
  2. GPS battery life28 h vs 84 h3×
  3. Battery life with always-on display4 days vs 13 days3.2×
  4. Battery saver mode12 days vs 41 days3.4×
  5. Screen size1.2″ vs 1.4″+17%
  6. Resolution (width)390 px vs 454 px+16%
  7. Sport profiles98 vs 102+4%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare