NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Enduro 2 vs Instinct 3 50mm Solar

Garmin Enduro 2 vs Garmin Instinct 3 50mm Solar

What Enduro 2 does better (8) and where Instinct 3 50mm Solar wins (4) — every spec side by side.

Garmin Enduro 2
Garmin · 2022Enduro 2
8.3Score
8 advantages≈ $1,000
Higher score
vs
Garmin Instinct 3 50mm Solar
Garmin · 2025Instinct 3 50mm Solar
6.9Score
4 advantages≈ $400
4.4Display4.0
9.7Battery life8.8
4.9Health tracking4.9
8.2Sports & outdoor6.2
8.8Build & durability5.5
Dimensions

Size comparison

Enduro 2Instinct 3 50mm Solar
51 × 5115.650 × 5014.4
Enduro 2Instinct 3 50mm SolarDifference
Height51 mm50 mm+1 mm
Width51 mm50 mm+1 mm
Thickness15.6 mm14.4 mm+1.2 mm
Weight70 g58 g+12 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Enduro 2 better than Instinct 3 50mm Solar?

  1. GPS battery life110 h vs 60 h+83%
  2. Storage32 GB vs 0.12 GB266.7×
  3. Sapphire crystalYes · Instinct 3 50mm Solar: No
  4. GPS battery life (dual-band)68 h vs 34 h2×
  5. Pixel density200 ppi vs 113 ppi+77%
  6. Resolution (width)280 px vs 176 px+59%
  7. Battery saver mode111 days vs 100 days+11%
  8. Sport profiles99 vs 94+5%

Why is Instinct 3 50mm Solar better than Enduro 2?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)34 days vs 40 days+18%
  2. Weight70 g vs 58 g+21%
  3. Screen size1.4″ vs 1.56″+11%
  4. Thickness15.6 mm vs 14.4 mm+8%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare