NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Enduro 3 vs Fenix E 47mm AMOLED

Garmin Enduro 3 vs Garmin Fenix E 47mm AMOLED

What Enduro 3 does better (7) and where Fenix E 47mm AMOLED wins (4) — every spec side by side.

Garmin Enduro 3
Garmin · 2024Enduro 3
8.4Score
7 advantages≈ $800
Higher score
vs
Garmin Fenix E 47mm AMOLED
Garmin · 2024Fenix E 47mm AMOLED
6.4Score
4 advantages≈ $800
4.4Display5.7
9.6Battery life6.7
8.3Health tracking4.9
7.0Sports & outdoor6.9
6.5Smart features6.5
9.2Build & durability5.0
Dimensions

Size comparison

Enduro 3Fenix E 47mm AMOLED
51 × 5115.747 × 4714.5
Enduro 3Fenix E 47mm AMOLEDDifference
Height51 mm47 mm+4 mm
Width51 mm47 mm+4 mm
Thickness15.7 mm14.5 mm+1.2 mm
Weight63 g76 g−13 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Enduro 3 better than Fenix E 47mm AMOLED?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)36 days vs 16 days2.2×
  2. GPS battery life120 h vs 42 h2.9×
  3. Battery saver mode92 days vs 21 days4.4×
  4. Weight63 g vs 76 g+21%
  5. Sapphire crystalYes · Fenix E 47mm AMOLED: No
  6. Storage32 GB vs 16 GB2×
  7. Screen size1.4″ vs 1.3″+8%

Why is Fenix E 47mm AMOLED better than Enduro 3?

  1. AMOLED / OLED displayNo · Enduro 3: Yes
  2. Pixel density200 ppi vs 320 ppi+60%
  3. Resolution (width)280 px vs 416 px+49%
  4. Thickness15.7 mm vs 14.5 mm+8%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare