NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Enduro 3 vs Grit X2 Pro

Garmin Enduro 3 vs Polar Grit X2 Pro

What Enduro 3 does better (4) and where Grit X2 Pro wins (4) — every spec side by side.

Garmin Enduro 3
Garmin · 2024Enduro 3
8.4Score
4 advantages≈ $800
Higher score
vs
Polar Grit X2 Pro
Polar · 2024Grit X2 Pro
6.7Score
4 advantages≈ $810
4.4Display8.3
9.6Battery life5.1
8.3Health tracking8.3
7.0Sports & outdoor2.9
9.2Build & durability6.7
Dimensions

Size comparison

Enduro 3Grit X2 Pro
51 × 5115.748.6 × 48.613.4
Enduro 3Grit X2 ProDifference
Height51 mm48.6 mm+2.4 mm
Width51 mm48.6 mm+2.4 mm
Thickness15.7 mm13.4 mm+2.3 mm
Weight63 g79 g−16 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Enduro 3 better than Grit X2 Pro?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)36 days vs 11 days3.3×
  2. GPS battery life120 h vs 40 h3×
  3. Weight63 g vs 79 g+25%
  4. LED flashlightYes · Grit X2 Pro: No

Why is Grit X2 Pro better than Enduro 3?

  1. AMOLED / OLED displayNo · Enduro 3: Yes
  2. Pixel density200 ppi vs 327 ppi+64%
  3. Resolution (width)280 px vs 454 px+62%
  4. Thickness15.7 mm vs 13.4 mm+17%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare