NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Enduro 4 vs Quatix 8 Pro 47mm AMOLED

Garmin Enduro 4 vs Garmin Quatix 8 Pro 47mm AMOLED

What Enduro 4 does better (6) and where Quatix 8 Pro 47mm AMOLED wins (4) — every spec side by side.

Garmin Enduro 4
Garmin · 2026Enduro 4
8.2Score
6 advantages≈ $900
Higher score
vs
Garmin Quatix 8 Pro 47mm AMOLED
7.8Score
4 advantages≈ $1,200
4.4Display7.5
9.5Battery life6.5
8.3Health tracking8.3
7.0Sports & outdoor8.2
6.5Smart features9.3
9.1Build & durability7.3
Dimensions

Size comparison

Enduro 4Quatix 8 Pro 47mm AMOLED
51 × 5115.747 × 4716
Enduro 4Quatix 8 Pro 47mm AMOLEDDifference
Height51 mm47 mm+4 mm
Width51 mm47 mm+4 mm
Thickness15.7 mm16 mm−0.3 mm
Weight66 g77 g−11 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Enduro 4 better than Quatix 8 Pro 47mm AMOLED?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)36 days vs 15 days2.4×
  2. GPS battery life80 h vs 44 h+82%
  3. Battery saver mode92 days vs 19 days4.8×
  4. GPS battery life (dual-band)60 h vs 30 h2×
  5. Storage64 GB vs 32 GB2×
  6. Weight66 g vs 77 g+17%

Why is Quatix 8 Pro 47mm AMOLED better than Enduro 4?

  1. AMOLED / OLED displayNo · Enduro 4: Yes
  2. Resolution (width)280 px vs 454 px+62%
  3. Pixel density200 ppi vs 324 ppi+62%
  4. Sport profiles97 vs 99+2%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare