NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Fenix 7 Pro Solar Edition (No Wi-Fi) vs Forerunner 965

Garmin Fenix 7 Pro Solar Edition (No Wi-Fi) vs Garmin Forerunner 965

What Fenix 7 Pro Solar Edition (No Wi-Fi) does better (4) and where Forerunner 965 wins (7) — every spec side by side.

Garmin Fenix 7 Pro Solar Edition (No Wi-Fi)
5.8Score
4 advantages≈ $800
vs
Garmin Forerunner 965
Garmin · 2023Forerunner 965
6.0Score
7 advantages≈ $600
Higher score
3.8Display6.5
7.4Battery life6.8
9.4Health tracking4.9
8.2Sports & outdoor6.0
2.2Smart features6.5
4.9Build & durability2.4
Dimensions

Size comparison

Fenix 7 Pro Solar Edition (No Wi-Fi)Forerunner 965
47 × 4714.547.2 × 47.213.2
Fenix 7 Pro Solar Edition (No Wi-Fi)Forerunner 965Difference
Height47 mm47.2 mm−0.2 mm
Width47 mm47.2 mm−0.2 mm
Thickness14.5 mm13.2 mm+1.3 mm
Weight79 g53 g+26 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Fenix 7 Pro Solar Edition (No Wi-Fi) better than Forerunner 965?

  1. GPS battery life57 h vs 31 h+84%
  2. Water resistance10 ATM vs 5 ATM2×
  3. Sport profiles99 vs 80+24%
  4. GPS battery life (dual-band)23 h vs 19 h+21%

Why is Forerunner 965 better than Fenix 7 Pro Solar Edition (No Wi-Fi)?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)18 days vs 23 days+28%
  2. AMOLED / OLED displayNo · Fenix 7 Pro Solar Edition (No Wi-Fi): Yes
  3. Weight79 g vs 53 g+49%
  4. Screen size1.3″ vs 1.4″+8%
  5. Resolution (width)260 px vs 454 px+75%
  6. Pixel density200 ppi vs 324 ppi+62%
  7. Thickness14.5 mm vs 13.2 mm+10%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare