NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Fenix 8 43mm AMOLED vs Quatix 8 47mm AMOLED

Garmin Fenix 8 43mm AMOLED vs Garmin Quatix 8 47mm AMOLED

What Fenix 8 43mm AMOLED does better (1) and where Quatix 8 47mm AMOLED wins (6) — every spec side by side.

Garmin Fenix 8 43mm AMOLED
Garmin · 2024Fenix 8 43mm AMOLED
6.0Score
1 advantage≈ $1,000
vs
Garmin Quatix 8 47mm AMOLED
Garmin · 2025Quatix 8 47mm AMOLED
8.0Score
6 advantages≈ $1,100
Higher score
5.7Display7.5
3.6Battery life6.8
8.3Health tracking8.3
8.2Sports & outdoor8.2
3.2Smart features3.2
8.0Build & durability7.7
Dimensions

Size comparison

Fenix 8 43mm AMOLEDQuatix 8 47mm AMOLED
43 × 4313.847 × 4713.8
Fenix 8 43mm AMOLEDQuatix 8 47mm AMOLEDDifference
Height43 mm47 mm−4 mm
Width43 mm47 mm−4 mm
Thickness13.8 mm13.8 mm=
Weight66 g73 g−7 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Fenix 8 43mm AMOLED better than Quatix 8 47mm AMOLED?

  1. Weight66 g vs 73 g+11%

Why is Quatix 8 47mm AMOLED better than Fenix 8 43mm AMOLED?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)10 days vs 16 days+60%
  2. GPS battery life28 h vs 47 h+68%
  3. Screen size1.3″ vs 1.4″+8%
  4. Battery life with always-on display4 days vs 7 days+75%
  5. Battery saver mode15 days vs 23 days+53%
  6. Resolution (width)416 px vs 454 px+9%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare