NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Fenix 8 51mm Solar vs Quatix 8 47mm AMOLED

Garmin Fenix 8 51mm Solar vs Garmin Quatix 8 47mm AMOLED

What Fenix 8 51mm Solar does better (3) and where Quatix 8 47mm AMOLED wins (5) — every spec side by side.

Garmin Fenix 8 51mm Solar
Garmin · 2024Fenix 8 51mm Solar
7.5Score
3 advantages≈ $1,100
vs
Garmin Quatix 8 47mm AMOLED
Garmin · 2025Quatix 8 47mm AMOLED
8.0Score
5 advantages≈ $1,100
Higher score
4.4Display7.5
9.3Battery life6.8
8.3Health tracking8.3
8.2Sports & outdoor8.2
3.2Smart features3.2
6.2Build & durability7.7
Dimensions

Size comparison

Fenix 8 51mm SolarQuatix 8 47mm AMOLED
51 × 5115.447 × 4713.8
Fenix 8 51mm SolarQuatix 8 47mm AMOLEDDifference
Height51 mm47 mm+4 mm
Width51 mm47 mm+4 mm
Thickness15.4 mm13.8 mm+1.6 mm
Weight95 g73 g+22 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Fenix 8 51mm Solar better than Quatix 8 47mm AMOLED?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)30 days vs 16 days+88%
  2. GPS battery life95 h vs 47 h2×
  3. Battery saver mode48 days vs 23 days2.1×

Why is Quatix 8 47mm AMOLED better than Fenix 8 51mm Solar?

  1. AMOLED / OLED displayNo · Fenix 8 51mm Solar: Yes
  2. Weight95 g vs 73 g+30%
  3. Resolution (width)280 px vs 454 px+62%
  4. Pixel density200 ppi vs 324 ppi+62%
  5. Thickness15.4 mm vs 13.8 mm+12%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare