NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Fenix 9 Pro inReach 47mm vs Quatix 8 Pro 47mm AMOLED

Garmin Fenix 9 Pro inReach 47mm vs Garmin Quatix 8 Pro 47mm AMOLED

What Fenix 9 Pro inReach 47mm does better (4) and where Quatix 8 Pro 47mm AMOLED wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Garmin Fenix 9 Pro inReach 47mm
7.6Score
4 advantages≈ $1,200
vs
Garmin Quatix 8 Pro 47mm AMOLED
7.8Score
2 advantages≈ $1,200
Higher score
7.5Display7.5
6.2Battery life6.5
8.3Health tracking8.3
8.2Sports & outdoor8.2
9.3Smart features9.3
7.2Build & durability7.3
Dimensions

Size comparison

Fenix 9 Pro inReach 47mmQuatix 8 Pro 47mm AMOLED
47 × 4713.847 × 4716
Fenix 9 Pro inReach 47mmQuatix 8 Pro 47mm AMOLEDDifference
Height47 mm47 mm=
Width47 mm47 mm=
Thickness13.8 mm16 mm−2.2 mm
Weight78 g77 g+1 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Fenix 9 Pro inReach 47mm better than Quatix 8 Pro 47mm AMOLED?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)18 days vs 15 days+20%
  2. Storage64 GB vs 32 GB2×
  3. Battery saver mode24 days vs 19 days+26%
  4. Thickness13.8 mm vs 16 mm+16%

Why is Quatix 8 Pro 47mm AMOLED better than Fenix 9 Pro inReach 47mm?

  1. GPS battery life32 h vs 44 h+38%
  2. GPS battery life (dual-band)26 h vs 30 h+15%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare