NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Fenix 9 Pro Solar 51mm vs Quatix 8 Pro 47mm AMOLED

Garmin Fenix 9 Pro Solar 51mm vs Garmin Quatix 8 Pro 47mm AMOLED

What Fenix 9 Pro Solar 51mm does better (5) and where Quatix 8 Pro 47mm AMOLED wins (5) — every spec side by side.

Garmin Fenix 9 Pro Solar 51mm
7.3Score
5 advantages≈ $1,200
vs
Garmin Quatix 8 Pro 47mm AMOLED
7.8Score
5 advantages≈ $1,200
Higher score
4.4Display7.5
8.9Battery life6.5
8.3Health tracking8.3
8.2Sports & outdoor8.2
3.2Smart features9.3
6.0Build & durability7.3
Dimensions

Size comparison

Fenix 9 Pro Solar 51mmQuatix 8 Pro 47mm AMOLED
51 × 5116.647 × 4716
Fenix 9 Pro Solar 51mmQuatix 8 Pro 47mm AMOLEDDifference
Height51 mm47 mm+4 mm
Width51 mm47 mm+4 mm
Thickness16.6 mm16 mm+0.6 mm
Weight102 g77 g+25 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Fenix 9 Pro Solar 51mm better than Quatix 8 Pro 47mm AMOLED?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)30 days vs 15 days2×
  2. GPS battery life75 h vs 44 h+70%
  3. Battery saver mode52 days vs 19 days2.7×
  4. Storage64 GB vs 32 GB2×
  5. GPS battery life (dual-band)54 h vs 30 h+80%

Why is Quatix 8 Pro 47mm AMOLED better than Fenix 9 Pro Solar 51mm?

  1. AMOLED / OLED displayNo · Fenix 9 Pro Solar 51mm: Yes
  2. Weight102 g vs 77 g+32%
  3. Resolution (width)280 px vs 454 px+62%
  4. Pixel density200 ppi vs 324 ppi+62%
  5. Thickness16.6 mm vs 16 mm+4%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare