NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Fenix E 47mm AMOLED vs Instinct Crossover AMOLED Tactical Edition

Garmin Fenix E 47mm AMOLED vs Garmin Instinct Crossover AMOLED Tactical Edition

What Fenix E 47mm AMOLED does better (8) and where Instinct Crossover AMOLED Tactical Edition wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Garmin Fenix E 47mm AMOLED
Garmin · 2024Fenix E 47mm AMOLED
6.4Score
8 advantages≈ $800
Higher score
vs
Garmin Instinct Crossover AMOLED Tactical Edition
6.4Score
2 advantages≈ $750
5.7Display5.9
6.7Battery life4.0
4.9Health tracking4.9
6.9Sports & outdoor6.8
5.0Build & durability9.1
Dimensions

Size comparison

Fenix E 47mm AMOLEDInstinct Crossover AMOLED Tactical Edition
47 × 4714.546.6 × 46.615.1
Fenix E 47mm AMOLEDInstinct Crossover AMOLED Tactical EditionDifference
Height47 mm46.6 mm+0.4 mm
Width47 mm46.6 mm+0.4 mm
Thickness14.5 mm15.1 mm−0.6 mm
Weight76 g67 g+9 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Fenix E 47mm AMOLED better than Instinct Crossover AMOLED Tactical Edition?

  1. GPS battery life42 h vs 29 h+45%
  2. Battery life (smartwatch mode)16 days vs 14 days+14%
  3. Storage16 GB vs 4 GB4×
  4. Screen size1.3″ vs 1.2″+8%
  5. Battery life with always-on display6 days vs 5 days+20%
  6. Battery saver mode21 days vs 18 days+17%
  7. Resolution (width)416 px vs 390 px+7%
  8. Thickness14.5 mm vs 15.1 mm+4%

Why is Instinct Crossover AMOLED Tactical Edition better than Fenix E 47mm AMOLED?

  1. Sapphire crystalNo · Fenix E 47mm AMOLED: Yes
  2. Weight76 g vs 67 g+13%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare