NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Fenix E 47mm AMOLED vs Ocean

Garmin Fenix E 47mm AMOLED vs Suunto Ocean

What Fenix E 47mm AMOLED does better (2) and where Ocean wins (6) — every spec side by side.

Garmin Fenix E 47mm AMOLED
Garmin · 2024Fenix E 47mm AMOLED
6.4Score
2 advantages≈ $800
vs
Suunto Ocean
Suunto · 2024Ocean
9.2Score
6 advantages≈ $750
Higher score
5.7Display8.4
6.7Battery life7.8
4.9Health tracking4.9
6.9Sports & outdoor6.4
5.0Build & durability8.0
Dimensions

Size comparison

Fenix E 47mm AMOLEDOcean
47 × 4714.549.9 × 49.913.3
Fenix E 47mm AMOLEDOceanDifference
Height47 mm49.9 mm−2.9 mm
Width47 mm49.9 mm−2.9 mm
Thickness14.5 mm13.3 mm+1.2 mm
Weight76 g99 g−23 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Fenix E 47mm AMOLED better than Ocean?

  1. Weight76 g vs 99 g+30%
  2. Sport profiles97 vs 95+2%

Why is Ocean better than Fenix E 47mm AMOLED?

  1. GPS battery life42 h vs 65 h+55%
  2. Sapphire crystalNo · Fenix E 47mm AMOLED: Yes
  3. Storage16 GB vs 32 GB2×
  4. Screen size1.3″ vs 1.43″+10%
  5. Resolution (width)416 px vs 466 px+12%
  6. Thickness14.5 mm vs 13.3 mm+9%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare