NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Forerunner 170 vs Street X

Garmin Forerunner 170 vs Polar Street X

What Forerunner 170 does better (2) and where Street X wins (3) — every spec side by side.

Garmin Forerunner 170
Garmin · 2026Forerunner 170
4.3Score
2 advantages≈ $300
vs
Polar Street X
Polar · 2026Street X
5.3Score
3 advantages≈ $270
Higher score
5.3Display6.4
2.9Battery life5.0
4.9Health tracking9.8
4.7Sports & outdoor2.4
3.1Build & durability4.2
Dimensions

Size comparison

Forerunner 170Street X
42.6 × 42.611.945 × 4513.8
Forerunner 170Street XDifference
Height42.6 mm45 mm−2.4 mm
Width42.6 mm45 mm−2.4 mm
Thickness11.9 mm13.8 mm−1.9 mm
Weight41 g48 g−7 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Forerunner 170 better than Street X?

  1. Weight41 g vs 48 g+17%
  2. Thickness11.9 mm vs 13.8 mm+16%

Why is Street X better than Forerunner 170?

  1. GPS battery life20 h vs 42 h2.1×
  2. Screen size1.2″ vs 1.28″+7%
  3. Resolution (width)390 px vs 416 px+7%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare