NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Forerunner 170 vs Run 2

Garmin Forerunner 170 vs Suunto Run 2

What Forerunner 170 does better (2) and where Run 2 wins (5) — every spec side by side.

Garmin Forerunner 170
Garmin · 2026Forerunner 170
4.3Score
2 advantages≈ $300
vs
Suunto Run 2
Suunto · 2026Run 2
5.4Score
5 advantages≈ $320
Higher score
5.3Display7.1
2.9Battery life4.6
4.9Health tracking4.9
4.7Sports & outdoor4.5
3.1Build & durability4.1
Dimensions

Size comparison

Forerunner 170Run 2
42.6 × 42.611.946.5 × 46.511.7
Forerunner 170Run 2Difference
Height42.6 mm46.5 mm−3.9 mm
Width42.6 mm46.5 mm−3.9 mm
Thickness11.9 mm11.7 mm+0.2 mm
Weight41 g53 g−12 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Forerunner 170 better than Run 2?

  1. Sport profiles78 vs 322.4×
  2. Weight41 g vs 53 g+29%

Why is Run 2 better than Forerunner 170?

  1. GPS battery life20 h vs 30 h+50%
  2. Battery life (smartwatch mode)10 days vs 12 days+20%
  3. Screen size1.2″ vs 1.32″+10%
  4. Resolution (width)390 px vs 466 px+19%
  5. Pixel density325 ppi vs 353 ppi+9%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare