vs
3.5Display2.9
4.8Battery life5.2
4.9Health tracking4.9
5.0Sports & outdoor5.2
2.7Build & durability2.7
Dimensions
Size comparison
Forerunner 255Forerunner 945 LTE
| Forerunner 255 | Forerunner 945 LTE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 45.6 mm | 44.4 mm | +1.2 mm |
| Width | 45.6 mm | 44.4 mm | +1.2 mm |
| Thickness | 12.9 mm | 13.9 mm | −1 mm |
| Weight | 49 g | 49 g | = |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Forerunner 255 better than Forerunner 945 LTE?
- Screen size1.3″ vs 1.2″+8%
- Resolution (width)260 px vs 240 px+8%
- Thickness12.9 mm vs 13.9 mm+8%
Why is Forerunner 945 LTE better than Forerunner 255?
- GPS battery life30 h vs 35 h+17%
- Storage4 GB vs 16 GB4×
- Sport profiles58 vs 60+3%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Case size | 46 mm | 44 mm |
| Weight | 49 g | 49 g |
| Thickness | 12.9 mm | 13.9 mm |
| Height | 45.6 mm | 44.4 mm |
| Width | 45.6 mm | 44.4 mm |
| Case material | Plastic / polymer | Plastic / polymer |
| Sapphire crystal | No | No |
| Lens / cover glass | Corning® Gorilla® Glass 3 | Corning® Gorilla® Glass 3 DX |
| Strap material | silicone | silicone |
| Water resistance | 5 ATM | 5 ATM |
| Water rating (maker) | 5 ATM | 5 ATM |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1.3″ | 1.2″ |
| Display technology | Memory-in-pixel (transflective) | Memory-in-pixel (transflective) |
| Panel | Sunlight-visible, transflective memory-in-pixel | Sunlight-visible, transflective memory-in-pixel |
| AMOLED / OLED display | No | No |
| Always-on display | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 260 px | 240 px |
| Resolution (height) | 260 px | 240 px |
| Pixel density | 200 ppi | 200 ppi |
| Battery | ||
| Battery life (smartwatch mode) | 14 days | 14 days |
| GPS battery life | 30 h | 35 h |
| GPS battery life (dual-band) | 16 h | — |
| Battery type | Lithium ion | — |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Charging | Garmin proprietary plug charger | Garmin proprietary plug charger |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | Yes | Yes |
| Blood oxygen (SpO2) | Yes | Yes |
| Temperature sensor | Yes | Yes |
| HRV tracking | Yes | Yes |
| Sleep tracking | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, QZSS, BeiDou, SatIQ technology, Elevate wrist heart rate monitor, Pulse Ox blood oxygen saturation monitor, Barometric altimeter, Compass, Gyroscope, Accelerometer, Thermometer | GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, Elevate wrist heart rate monitor, Pulse Ox blood oxygen saturation monitor, Barometric altimeter, Compass, Gyroscope, Accelerometer, Thermometer |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Built-in GPS | Yes | Yes |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | — |
| Satellite systems | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Offline maps | — | Yes |
| Barometric altimeter | Yes | Yes |
| Compass | Yes | Yes |
| Multisport / triathlon mode | Yes | Yes |
| Sport profiles | 58 | 60 |
| Connectivity | ||
| NFC payments | Yes | Yes |
| LTE (cellular) | — | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | — | Wi-Fi 4 |
| ANT+ sensors | Yes | Yes |
| Smart features | ||
| Music on the watch | — | Yes |
| Storage | 4 GB | 16 GB |
| Third-party apps | Yes | Yes |
| Platform | ||
| Operating system | Garmin OS | Garmin OS |
| Platform | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Works with | iOS, Android | iOS, Android |
Related comparisons
vs
Garmin Forerunner 255vsDiesel Griffed Gen 64.23.7
vs
Garmin Forerunner 255vsGarmin Forerunner 9654.26.0
vs
Garmin Forerunner 255vsGarmin Forerunner 2654.24.7
vs
Garmin Forerunner 255vsPolar Pacer Pro4.23.7
vs
Garmin Forerunner 255vsAsus VivoWatch 54.23.8
vs
Garmin Forerunner 255SvsGarmin Forerunner 2553.94.2

