NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Forerunner 255 vs Vantage M2

Garmin Forerunner 255 vs Polar Vantage M2

What Forerunner 255 does better (5) and where Vantage M2 wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Garmin Forerunner 255
Garmin · 2022Forerunner 255
4.2Score
5 advantages≈ $350
Higher score
vs
Polar Vantage M2
Polar · 2021Vantage M2
3.6Score
2 advantages≈ $320
3.5Display2.9
4.8Battery life3.4
5.0Sports & outdoor2.1
2.7Build & durability2.1
Dimensions

Size comparison

Forerunner 255Vantage M2
45.6 × 45.612.946 × 4612.5
Forerunner 255Vantage M2Difference
Height45.6 mm46 mm−0.4 mm
Width45.6 mm46 mm−0.4 mm
Thickness12.9 mm12.5 mm+0.4 mm
Weight49 g45 g+4 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Forerunner 255 better than Vantage M2?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)14 days vs 8 days+75%
  2. Water resistance5 ATM vs 3 ATM+67%
  3. GPS battery life30 h vs 28 h+7%
  4. Screen size1.3″ vs 1.2″+8%
  5. Resolution (width)260 px vs 240 px+8%

Why is Vantage M2 better than Forerunner 255?

  1. Weight49 g vs 45 g+9%
  2. Thickness12.9 mm vs 12.5 mm+3%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare