NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Forerunner 255S Music vs Pacer Pro

Garmin Forerunner 255S Music vs Polar Pacer Pro

What Forerunner 255S Music does better (2) and where Pacer Pro wins (4) — every spec side by side.

Garmin Forerunner 255S Music
Garmin · 2022Forerunner 255S Music
4.1Score
2 advantages≈ $400
Higher score
vs
Polar Pacer Pro
Polar · 2022Pacer Pro
3.7Score
4 advantages≈ $380
2.2Display2.3
3.7Battery life3.2
4.9Health tracking2.1
5.0Sports & outdoor2.2
3.5Build & durability4.4
Dimensions

Size comparison

Forerunner 255S MusicPacer Pro
41 × 4112.445 × 4511.5
Forerunner 255S MusicPacer ProDifference
Height41 mm45 mm−4 mm
Width41 mm45 mm−4 mm
Thickness12.4 mm11.5 mm+0.9 mm
Weight39 g41 g−2 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Forerunner 255S Music better than Pacer Pro?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)12 days vs 6.5 days+85%
  2. Weight39 g vs 41 g+5%

Why is Pacer Pro better than Forerunner 255S Music?

  1. GPS battery life26 h vs 30 h+15%
  2. Screen size1.1″ vs 1.2″+9%
  3. Resolution (width)218 px vs 240 px+10%
  4. Thickness12.4 mm vs 11.5 mm+8%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare