vs
2.2Display2.3
3.7Battery life3.2
4.9Health tracking2.1
5.0Sports & outdoor2.2
3.5Build & durability4.4
Dimensions
Size comparison
Forerunner 255S MusicPacer Pro
| Forerunner 255S Music | Pacer Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 41 mm | 45 mm | −4 mm |
| Width | 41 mm | 45 mm | −4 mm |
| Thickness | 12.4 mm | 11.5 mm | +0.9 mm |
| Weight | 39 g | 41 g | −2 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Forerunner 255S Music better than Pacer Pro?
- Battery life (smartwatch mode)12 days vs 6.5 days+85%
- Weight39 g vs 41 g+5%
Why is Pacer Pro better than Forerunner 255S Music?
- GPS battery life26 h vs 30 h+15%
- Screen size1.1″ vs 1.2″+9%
- Resolution (width)218 px vs 240 px+10%
- Thickness12.4 mm vs 11.5 mm+8%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Case size | 41 mm | 45 mm |
| Weight | 39 g | 41 g |
| Thickness | 12.4 mm | 11.5 mm |
| Height | 41 mm | 45 mm |
| Width | 41 mm | 45 mm |
| Case material | Plastic / polymer | Aluminium |
| Sapphire crystal | No | — |
| Lens / cover glass | Corning® Gorilla® Glass 3 | — |
| Strap material | silicone | — |
| Water resistance | 5 ATM | 5 ATM |
| Water rating (maker) | 5 ATM | WR50 |
| Military-grade (MIL-STD-810) | — | Yes |
| Colours | — | Snow White, Carbon Gray, Gold Dust |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1.1″ | 1.2″ |
| Display technology | Memory-in-pixel (transflective) | Memory-in-pixel (transflective) |
| Panel | Sunlight-visible, transflective memory-in-pixel | MIP |
| AMOLED / OLED display | No | No |
| Always-on display | Yes | Yes |
| Touchscreen | — | No |
| Resolution (width) | 218 px | 240 px |
| Resolution (height) | 218 px | 240 px |
| Pixel density | 198 ppi | 200 ppi |
| Battery | ||
| Battery life (smartwatch mode) | 12 days | 6.5 days |
| GPS battery life | 26 h | 30 h |
| GPS battery life (dual-band) | 13 h | — |
| Battery capacity | — | 265 mAh |
| Battery type | Lithium ion | Li-Pol |
| Wireless charging | No | — |
| Charging | Garmin proprietary plug charger | — |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | Yes | Yes |
| Blood oxygen (SpO2) | Yes | — |
| Skin temperature | — | No |
| Temperature sensor | Yes | — |
| HRV tracking | Yes | Yes |
| Sleep tracking | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, QZSS, BeiDou, SatIQ technology, Elevate wrist heart rate monitor, Pulse Ox blood oxygen saturation monitor, Barometric altimeter, Compass, Gyroscope, Accelerometer, Thermometer | Barometer, Magnetometer compass, Accelerometer |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Built-in GPS | Yes | Yes |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | — |
| Satellite systems | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | — |
| Offline maps | — | No |
| Barometric altimeter | Yes | Yes |
| Compass | Yes | Yes |
| Multisport / triathlon mode | Yes | — |
| Sport profiles | 58 | — |
| LED flashlight | — | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| NFC payments | Yes | — |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 4 | — |
| Bluetooth | — | 5.1 |
| ANT+ sensors | Yes | — |
| Smart features | ||
| Music on the watch | Yes | — |
| Storage | 4 GB | — |
| Third-party apps | Yes | — |
| Platform | ||
| Operating system | Garmin OS | Polar OS |
| Platform | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Works with | iOS, Android | — |
Related comparisons
vs
Garmin Forerunner 255S MusicvsDiesel Griffed Gen 64.13.7
vs
Garmin Forerunner 255S MusicvsAsus VivoWatch 54.13.8
vs
Garmin Forerunner 255 MusicvsGarmin Forerunner 255S Music4.34.1
vs
Polar Pacer ProvsDiesel Griffed Gen 63.73.7
vs
Garmin Forerunner 255SvsPolar Pacer Pro3.93.7
vs
Garmin Forerunner 255 MusicvsPolar Pacer Pro4.33.7
