NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Forerunner 265S vs Pacer Pro

Garmin Forerunner 265S vs Polar Pacer Pro

What Forerunner 265S does better (6) and where Pacer Pro wins (3) — every spec side by side.

Garmin Forerunner 265S
Garmin · 2023Forerunner 265S
5.2Score
6 advantages≈ $450
Higher score
vs
Polar Pacer Pro
Polar · 2022Pacer Pro
3.7Score
3 advantages≈ $380
5.0Display2.3
3.9Battery life3.2
4.9Health tracking2.1
5.0Sports & outdoor2.2
3.5Build & durability4.4
Dimensions

Size comparison

Forerunner 265SPacer Pro
41.7 × 41.712.945 × 4511.5
Forerunner 265SPacer ProDifference
Height41.7 mm45 mm−3.3 mm
Width41.7 mm45 mm−3.3 mm
Thickness12.9 mm11.5 mm+1.4 mm
Weight39 g41 g−2 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Forerunner 265S better than Pacer Pro?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)15 days vs 6.5 days2.3×
  2. AMOLED / OLED displayYes · Pacer Pro: No
  3. TouchscreenYes · Pacer Pro: No
  4. Weight39 g vs 41 g+5%
  5. Pixel density327 ppi vs 200 ppi+64%
  6. Resolution (width)360 px vs 240 px+50%

Why is Pacer Pro better than Forerunner 265S?

  1. GPS battery life24 h vs 30 h+25%
  2. Screen size1.1″ vs 1.2″+9%
  3. Thickness12.9 mm vs 11.5 mm+12%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare