NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Forerunner 570 42mm vs Race 2

Garmin Forerunner 570 42mm vs Suunto Race 2

What Forerunner 570 42mm does better (2) and where Race 2 wins (10) — every spec side by side.

Garmin Forerunner 570 42mm
Garmin · 2025Forerunner 570 42mm
4.5Score
2 advantages≈ $550
vs
Suunto Race 2
Suunto · 2025Race 2
9.0Score
10 advantages≈ $510
Higher score
5.3Display6.3
2.6Battery life8.0
9.4Health tracking4.9
5.5Sports & outdoor6.4
3.0Build & durability8.4
Dimensions

Size comparison

Forerunner 570 42mmRace 2
42.4 × 42.412.949 × 4912.5
Forerunner 570 42mmRace 2Difference
Height42.4 mm49 mm−6.6 mm
Width42.4 mm49 mm−6.6 mm
Thickness12.9 mm12.5 mm+0.4 mm
Weight42 g76 g−34 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Forerunner 570 42mm better than Race 2?

  1. Weight42 g vs 76 g+81%
  2. Pixel density325 ppi vs 311 ppi+5%

Why is Race 2 better than Forerunner 570 42mm?

  1. GPS battery life18 h vs 65 h3.6×
  2. Battery life (smartwatch mode)10 days vs 18 days+80%
  3. Water resistance5 ATM vs 10 ATM2×
  4. GPS battery life (dual-band)13 h vs 55 h4.2×
  5. Storage8 GB vs 32 GB4×
  6. Screen size1.2″ vs 1.5″+25%
  7. Sapphire crystalNo · Forerunner 570 42mm: Yes
  8. Resolution (width)390 px vs 466 px+19%
  9. Sport profiles83 vs 95+14%
  10. Thickness12.9 mm vs 12.5 mm+3%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare