NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Instinct 2S Solar vs Pacer Pro

Garmin Instinct 2S Solar vs Polar Pacer Pro

What Instinct 2S Solar does better (2) and where Pacer Pro wins (6) — every spec side by side.

Garmin Instinct 2S Solar
Garmin · 2022Instinct 2S Solar
4.8Score
2 advantages≈ $400
Higher score
vs
Polar Pacer Pro
Polar · 2022Pacer Pro
3.7Score
6 advantages≈ $380
2.1Display2.3
6.4Battery life3.2
4.9Health tracking2.1
4.2Sports & outdoor2.2
5.8Build & durability4.4
Dimensions

Size comparison

Instinct 2S SolarPacer Pro
40 × 4013.345 × 4511.5
Instinct 2S SolarPacer ProDifference
Height40 mm45 mm−5 mm
Width40 mm45 mm−5 mm
Thickness13.3 mm11.5 mm+1.8 mm
Weight43 g41 g+2 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Instinct 2S Solar better than Pacer Pro?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)21 days vs 6.5 days3.2×
  2. Water resistance10 ATM vs 5 ATM2×

Why is Pacer Pro better than Instinct 2S Solar?

  1. GPS battery life22 h vs 30 h+36%
  2. Screen size1.12″ vs 1.2″+7%
  3. Weight43 g vs 41 g+5%
  4. Resolution (width)156 px vs 240 px+54%
  5. Pixel density139 ppi vs 200 ppi+44%
  6. Thickness13.3 mm vs 11.5 mm+16%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare