NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Instinct 3 45mm AMOLED vs Instinct 3 50mm AMOLED

Garmin Instinct 3 45mm AMOLED vs Garmin Instinct 3 50mm AMOLED

What Instinct 3 45mm AMOLED does better (1) and where Instinct 3 50mm AMOLED wins (8) — every spec side by side.

Garmin Instinct 3 45mm AMOLED
6.7Score
1 advantage≈ $350
vs
Garmin Instinct 3 50mm AMOLED
7.5Score
8 advantages≈ $400
Higher score
5.9Display5.6
5.6Battery life7.3
4.9Health tracking4.9
6.6Sports & outdoor6.6
5.6Build & durability5.4
Dimensions

Size comparison

Instinct 3 45mm AMOLEDInstinct 3 50mm AMOLED
45 × 4514.950 × 5014.4
Instinct 3 45mm AMOLEDInstinct 3 50mm AMOLEDDifference
Height45 mm50 mm−5 mm
Width45 mm50 mm−5 mm
Thickness14.9 mm14.4 mm+0.5 mm
Weight53 g59 g−6 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Instinct 3 45mm AMOLED better than Instinct 3 50mm AMOLED?

  1. Weight53 g vs 59 g+11%

Why is Instinct 3 50mm AMOLED better than Instinct 3 45mm AMOLED?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)18 days vs 24 days+33%
  2. GPS battery life32 h vs 40 h+25%
  3. Screen size1.2″ vs 1.3″+8%
  4. GPS battery life (dual-band)23 h vs 30 h+30%
  5. Battery life with always-on display7 days vs 9 days+29%
  6. Battery saver mode24 days vs 30 days+25%
  7. Resolution (width)390 px vs 416 px+7%
  8. Thickness14.9 mm vs 14.4 mm+3%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare