NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Instinct 3 45mm AMOLED vs Race 2

Garmin Instinct 3 45mm AMOLED vs Suunto Race 2

What Instinct 3 45mm AMOLED does better (2) and where Race 2 wins (7) — every spec side by side.

Garmin Instinct 3 45mm AMOLED
6.7Score
2 advantages≈ $350
vs
Suunto Race 2
Suunto · 2025Race 2
9.0Score
7 advantages≈ $510
Higher score
5.9Display6.3
5.6Battery life8.0
4.9Health tracking4.9
6.6Sports & outdoor6.4
5.6Build & durability8.4
Dimensions

Size comparison

Instinct 3 45mm AMOLEDRace 2
45 × 4514.949 × 4912.5
Instinct 3 45mm AMOLEDRace 2Difference
Height45 mm49 mm−4 mm
Width45 mm49 mm−4 mm
Thickness14.9 mm12.5 mm+2.4 mm
Weight53 g76 g−23 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Instinct 3 45mm AMOLED better than Race 2?

  1. Weight53 g vs 76 g+43%
  2. Pixel density325 ppi vs 311 ppi+5%

Why is Race 2 better than Instinct 3 45mm AMOLED?

  1. GPS battery life32 h vs 65 h2×
  2. Storage4 GB vs 32 GB8×
  3. GPS battery life (dual-band)23 h vs 55 h2.4×
  4. Screen size1.2″ vs 1.5″+25%
  5. Sapphire crystalNo · Instinct 3 45mm AMOLED: Yes
  6. Resolution (width)390 px vs 466 px+19%
  7. Thickness14.9 mm vs 12.5 mm+19%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare