NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Instinct 3 45mm AMOLED vs Race S

Garmin Instinct 3 45mm AMOLED vs Suunto Race S

What Instinct 3 45mm AMOLED does better (2) and where Race S wins (8) — every spec side by side.

Garmin Instinct 3 45mm AMOLED
6.7Score
2 advantages≈ $350
Higher score
vs
Suunto Race S
Suunto · 2024Race S
6.1Score
8 advantages≈ $300
5.9Display4.8
5.6Battery life4.6
4.9Health tracking4.9
6.6Sports & outdoor6.4
5.6Build & durability9.5
Dimensions

Size comparison

Instinct 3 45mm AMOLEDRace S
45 × 4514.945 × 4511.4
Instinct 3 45mm AMOLEDRace SDifference
Height45 mm45 mm=
Width45 mm45 mm=
Thickness14.9 mm11.4 mm+3.5 mm
Weight53 g53 g=

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Instinct 3 45mm AMOLED better than Race S?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)18 days vs 9 days2×
  2. AMOLED / OLED displayYes · Race S: No

Why is Race S better than Instinct 3 45mm AMOLED?

  1. GPS battery life32 h vs 40 h+25%
  2. Storage4 GB vs 32 GB8×
  3. Sapphire crystalNo · Instinct 3 45mm AMOLED: Yes
  4. Screen size1.2″ vs 1.32″+10%
  5. Thickness14.9 mm vs 11.4 mm+31%
  6. GPS battery life (dual-band)23 h vs 30 h+30%
  7. Resolution (width)390 px vs 466 px+19%
  8. Pixel density325 ppi vs 353 ppi+9%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare