NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Instinct Crossover vs Vertical

Garmin Instinct Crossover vs Suunto Vertical

What Instinct Crossover does better (3) and where Vertical wins (7) — every spec side by side.

Garmin Instinct Crossover
Garmin · 2022Instinct Crossover
6.5Score
3 advantages≈ $400
vs
Suunto Vertical
Suunto · 2023Vertical
8.3Score
7 advantages≈ $400
Higher score
2.6Display4.4
9.6Battery life9.5
4.9Health tracking4.9
5.3Sports & outdoor6.4
5.3Build & durability7.9
Dimensions

Size comparison

Instinct CrossoverVertical
45 × 4516.249 × 4913.6
Instinct CrossoverVerticalDifference
Height45 mm49 mm−4 mm
Width45 mm49 mm−4 mm
Thickness16.2 mm13.6 mm+2.6 mm
Weight65 g86 g−21 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Instinct Crossover better than Vertical?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)28 days vs 20.8 days+35%
  2. GPS battery life111 h vs 90 h+23%
  3. Weight65 g vs 86 g+32%

Why is Vertical better than Instinct Crossover?

  1. Storage0.06 GB vs 32 GB533.3×
  2. Sapphire crystalNo · Instinct Crossover: Yes
  3. Screen size1.27″ vs 1.4″+10%
  4. Resolution (width)176 px vs 280 px+59%
  5. Pixel density139 ppi vs 200 ppi+44%
  6. Thickness16.2 mm vs 13.6 mm+19%
  7. Sport profiles84 vs 95+13%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare