NewXiaomi Watch S5 41mm added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Vivoactive 6 vs Galaxy Watch Ultra 2025

Garmin Vivoactive 6 vs Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra 2025

What Vivoactive 6 does better (4) and where Galaxy Watch Ultra 2025 wins (6) — every spec side by side.

Garmin Vivoactive 6
Garmin · 2025Vivoactive 6
7.0Score
4 advantages≈ $300
vs
Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra 2025
7.6Score
6 advantages≈ $320
Higher score
4.8Display8.1
7.4Battery life5.1
4.9Health tracking8.5
8.0Sports & outdoor8.0
7.3Smart features7.4
3.7Build & durability9.3
Dimensions

Size comparison

Vivoactive 6Galaxy Watch Ultra 2025
42.2 × 42.210.947.1 × 47.412.1
Vivoactive 6Galaxy Watch Ultra 2025Difference
Height42.2 mm47.4 mm−5.2 mm
Width42.2 mm47.1 mm−4.9 mm
Thickness10.9 mm12.1 mm−1.2 mm
Weight23 g61 g−38 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Vivoactive 6 better than Galaxy Watch Ultra 2025?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)11 days vs 2.5 days4.4×
  2. Weight23 g vs 61 g2.7×
  3. Wi-FiWi-Fi 4 vs Wi-Fi 14×
  4. Thickness10.9 mm vs 12.1 mm+11%

Why is Galaxy Watch Ultra 2025 better than Vivoactive 6?

  1. Water resistance5 ATM vs 10 ATM2×
  2. Storage8 GB vs 64 GB8×
  3. Screen size1.2″ vs 1.5″+25%
  4. Sapphire crystalNo · Vivoactive 6: Yes
  5. Wireless chargingNo · Vivoactive 6: Yes
  6. Resolution (width)390 px vs 480 px+23%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare