Why is 5010 better than 8900?
- Screen size1.38″ vs 1.3″+6%
Why is 8900 better than 5010?
- AMOLED / OLED displayNo · 5010: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Case size | — | 42 mm |
| Weight | — | 40 g |
| Case material | — | Aluminium |
| Strap material | Silikon | Silikon |
| Colours | Silver | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1.38″ | 1.3″ |
| Display technology | LCD | AMOLED |
| Panel | LCD | OLED |
| AMOLED / OLED display | No | Yes |
| Touchscreen | — | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | — | 466 px |
| Resolution (height) | — | 466 px |
| Battery | ||
| Battery life (smartwatch mode) | 7 days | — |
| Battery life (hours) | 168 h | — |
| Battery capacity | 300 mAh | 300 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | Yes | Yes |
| Blood oxygen (SpO2) | Yes | Yes |
| ECG | — | Yes |
| Sleep tracking | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | — | heart rate, ambient light |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Built-in GPS | — | Yes |
| Satellite systems | — | GPS |
| Compass | — | Yes |
| Multisport / triathlon mode | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.3 |
| Smart features | ||
| Voice assistant | — | Yes |
| Platform | ||
| Works with | — | iOS, Android |
