9.1Display9.1
4.9Health tracking4.9
Dimensions
Size comparison
9000FW66 Iron R
| 9000 | FW66 Iron R | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Case size | 47 mm | 45 mm | +2 mm |
| Thickness | 14 mm | 11 mm | +3 mm |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is 9000 better than FW66 Iron R?
- Battery capacity450 mAh vs 300 mAh+50%
Why is FW66 Iron R better than 9000?
- Battery life (smartwatch mode)8 days vs 14 days+75%
- Thickness14 mm vs 11 mm+27%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Case size | 47 mm | 45 mm |
| Weight | — | 56 g |
| Thickness | 14 mm | 11 mm |
| Height | — | 51 mm |
| Width | — | 45 mm |
| Case material | Stainless steel | — |
| Lens / cover glass | Panda Glass | 2.5D-Glas Kristallglas |
| Strap material | Silikon | Edelstahl, Silikon |
| Water resistance | 5 ATM | — |
| Water rating (maker) | 50 m / 5 bar / 5 ATM | — |
| Colours | Anthracite | Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1.43″ | 1.43″ |
| Display technology | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Panel | Farbdisplay | AMOLED |
| AMOLED / OLED display | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 466 px | 466 px |
| Resolution (height) | 466 px | 466 px |
| Battery | ||
| Battery life (smartwatch mode) | 8 days | 14 days |
| Battery capacity | 450 mAh | 300 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | — |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | Yes | Yes |
| Blood oxygen (SpO2) | Yes | Yes |
| Sleep tracking | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | heart rate, SpO2, accelerometer | heart rate, SpO2 |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Built-in GPS | Yes | — |
| Satellite systems | GPS | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| LTE (cellular) | — | No |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | — |
| Smart features | ||
| Voice assistant | Yes | — |
| Music on the watch | — | Yes |
| Storage | — | 128 GB |
| Platform | ||
| Works with | iOS, Android | — |
| Chipset | — | RTL8763E |
