vs
5.5Health tracking9.5
Dimensions
Size comparison
Fit Watch 5000ONAIR
| Fit Watch 5000 | ONAIR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 255 mm | 46 mm | +209 mm |
| Width | 37 mm | 23 mm | +14 mm |
| Thickness | 10 mm | 11 mm | −1 mm |
| Weight | 35 g | 15 g | +20 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Fit Watch 5000 better than ONAIR?
- Battery capacity300 mAh vs 180 mAh+67%
- Thickness10 mm vs 11 mm+10%
Why is ONAIR better than Fit Watch 5000?
- Battery life (smartwatch mode)7 days vs 25 days3.6×
- Weight35 g vs 15 g2.3×
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Weight | 35 g | 15 g |
| Thickness | 10 mm | 11 mm |
| Height | 255 mm | 46 mm |
| Width | 37 mm | 23 mm |
| Case material | Stainless steel | Plastic / polymer |
| Strap material | Kunststoff | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1.65″ | — |
| Display technology | LCD | — |
| Panel | LCD | — |
| AMOLED / OLED display | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery life (smartwatch mode) | 7 days | 25 days |
| Battery capacity | 300 mAh | 180 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | — |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | Yes | Yes |
| Blood oxygen (SpO2) | Yes | Yes |
| ECG | Yes | — |
| Skin temperature | — | Yes |
| HRV tracking | — | Yes |
| Sleep tracking | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | heart rate, SpO2 | heart rate, SpO2, temperature |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Built-in GPS | Yes | — |
| Satellite systems | GPS | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | — |
| Platform | ||
| Works with | iOS, Android | — |
