vs
4.7Display3.6
5.5Health tracking5.5
Dimensions
Size comparison
Fit Watch 5000Smart Band 11 Active
| Fit Watch 5000 | Smart Band 11 Active | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 255 mm | 43.5 mm | +211.5 mm |
| Width | 37 mm | 25.8 mm | +11.2 mm |
| Thickness | 10 mm | 10.2 mm | −0.2 mm |
| Weight | 35 g | 18 g | +17 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Fit Watch 5000 better than Smart Band 11 Active?
- Screen size1.65″ vs 1.47″+12%
Why is Smart Band 11 Active better than Fit Watch 5000?
- Battery life (smartwatch mode)7 days vs 21 days3×
- Weight35 g vs 18 g+94%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Case size | — | 44 mm |
| Weight | 35 g | 18 g |
| Thickness | 10 mm | 10.2 mm |
| Height | 255 mm | 43.5 mm |
| Width | 37 mm | 25.8 mm |
| Case material | Stainless steel | Plastic / polymer |
| Lens / cover glass | — | 2.5D-Glas |
| Strap material | Kunststoff | Silikon |
| Water resistance | — | 5 ATM |
| Water rating (maker) | — | 50 m / 5 ATM |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1.65″ | 1.47″ |
| Display technology | LCD | LCD |
| Panel | LCD | TFT |
| AMOLED / OLED display | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | — | 172 px |
| Resolution (height) | — | 320 px |
| Battery | ||
| Battery life (smartwatch mode) | 7 days | 21 days |
| Battery capacity | 300 mAh | 300 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | — |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | Yes | Yes |
| Blood oxygen (SpO2) | Yes | Yes |
| ECG | Yes | Yes |
| Sleep tracking | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | heart rate, SpO2 | heart rate, SpO2, accelerometer |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Built-in GPS | Yes | — |
| Satellite systems | GPS | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.3 |
| Platform | ||
| Works with | iOS, Android | iOS, Android |
