vs
3.5Display5.7
5.0Health tracking5.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
Watch 4000Moto Watch
| Watch 4000 | Moto Watch | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Case size | 46 mm | 47 mm | −1 mm |
| Thickness | 11 mm | 12 mm | −1 mm |
| Weight | 39 g | 35 g | +4 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Watch 4000 better than Moto Watch?
- Screen size1.65″ vs 1.43″+15%
- Thickness11 mm vs 12 mm+9%
Why is Moto Watch better than Watch 4000?
- AMOLED / OLED displayNo · Watch 4000: Yes
- Weight39 g vs 35 g+11%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Case size | 46 mm | 47 mm |
| Weight | 39 g | 35 g |
| Thickness | 11 mm | 12 mm |
| Height | — | 47 mm |
| Width | — | 47 mm |
| Case material | Stainless steel | — |
| Strap material | Kunststoff | — |
| Water resistance | — | 5 ATM |
| Ingress protection | — | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx8 |
| Colours | Black | Volcanic Ash, Silver |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1.65″ | 1.43″ |
| Display technology | LCD | OLED |
| Panel | LCD | OLED |
| AMOLED / OLED display | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | — | 464 px |
| Resolution (height) | — | 464 px |
| Pixel density | — | 317 ppi |
| Refresh rate | — | 60 Hz |
| Battery | ||
| Battery life (smartwatch mode) | 6 days | — |
| Battery capacity | 300 mAh | — |
| Battery type | Li-Po | — |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | Yes | Yes |
| Blood oxygen (SpO2) | Yes | Yes |
| Sleep tracking | Yes | — |
| Sensors | heart rate, SpO2, accelerometer | Accelerometer, gyro, heart rate, SpO2, compass |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Built-in GPS | Yes | Yes |
| Dual-band GPS | — | Yes |
| Satellite systems | GPS | — |
| Compass | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| NFC payments | — | Yes |
| LTE (cellular) | — | No |
| eSIM | — | No |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.3 |
| Smart features | ||
| Speaker | — | Yes |
| Voice assistant | Yes | — |
| Platform | ||
| Operating system | — | Unspecified |
| Platform | — | Proprietary |
| Works with | iOS, Android | — |
