NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Watch 4000 vs GTR 3 Pro

Hama Watch 4000 vs Zeblaze GTR 3 Pro

What Watch 4000 does better (2) and where GTR 3 Pro wins (3) — every spec side by side.

Hama Watch 4000
Hama · 2025Watch 4000
4.8Score
2 advantages≈ $25
vs
Zeblaze GTR 3 Pro
Zeblaze · 2025GTR 3 Pro
7.4Score
3 advantages≈ $30
Higher score
3.5Display6.8
5.0Health tracking5.0
Dimensions

Size comparison

Watch 4000GTR 3 Pro
46 × 461145 × 4510.7
Watch 4000GTR 3 ProDifference
Case size46 mm45 mm+1 mm
Thickness11 mm10.7 mm+0.3 mm

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Watch 4000 better than GTR 3 Pro?

  1. Screen size1.65″ vs 1.43″+15%
  2. Battery capacity300 mAh vs 260 mAh+15%

Why is GTR 3 Pro better than Watch 4000?

  1. AMOLED / OLED displayNo · Watch 4000: Yes
  2. Battery life (smartwatch mode)6 days vs 7 days+17%
  3. Thickness11 mm vs 10.7 mm+3%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare