NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Watch 4000 vs GTS 4

Hama Watch 4000 vs Zeblaze GTS 4

What Watch 4000 does better (1) and where GTS 4 wins (4) — every spec side by side.

Hama Watch 4000
Hama · 2025Watch 4000
4.8Score
1 advantage≈ $25
vs
Zeblaze GTS 4
Zeblaze · 2026GTS 4
9.2Score
4 advantages≈ $25
Higher score
3.5Display9.7
5.0Health tracking5.0
Dimensions

Size comparison

Watch 4000GTS 4
46 × 461147 × 478.7
Watch 4000GTS 4Difference
Case size46 mm47 mm−1 mm
Thickness11 mm8.7 mm+2.3 mm

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Watch 4000 better than GTS 4?

  1. Battery capacity300 mAh vs 260 mAh+15%

Why is GTS 4 better than Watch 4000?

  1. AMOLED / OLED displayNo · Watch 4000: Yes
  2. Battery life (smartwatch mode)6 days vs 7 days+17%
  3. Screen size1.65″ vs 1.94″+18%
  4. Thickness11 mm vs 8.7 mm+26%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare