vs
3.5Display4.0
5.0Health tracking5.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
Watch 6010BT103
| Watch 6010 | BT103 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 255 mm | 49.5 mm | +205.5 mm |
| Width | 37 mm | 40 mm | −3 mm |
| Thickness | 10 mm | 10.9 mm | −0.9 mm |
| Weight | 35 g | 100 g | −65 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Watch 6010 better than BT103?
- Built-in GPSYes · BT103: No
- Weight35 g vs 100 g2.9×
- Thickness10 mm vs 10.9 mm+9%
Why is BT103 better than Watch 6010?
- Screen size1.65″ vs 1.91″+16%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Case size | — | 50 mm |
| Weight | 35 g | 100 g |
| Thickness | 10 mm | 10.9 mm |
| Height | 255 mm | 49.5 mm |
| Width | 37 mm | 40 mm |
| Case material | Plastic / polymer | — |
| Lens / cover glass | — | Tempered glass |
| Strap material | Kunststoff | — |
| Colours | — | Black, White |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1.65″ | 1.91″ |
| Display technology | LCD | LCD |
| Panel | LCD | TFT LCD |
| AMOLED / OLED display | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | — | 320 px |
| Resolution (height) | — | 380 px |
| Pixel density | — | 260 ppi |
| Refresh rate | — | 60 Hz |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | — | 300 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | — |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | Yes | Yes |
| Blood oxygen (SpO2) | Yes | Yes |
| ECG | Yes | — |
| Sensors | heart rate, SpO2 | Accelerometer, heart rate, SpO2 |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Built-in GPS | Yes | No |
| Satellite systems | GPS | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| NFC payments | — | No |
| LTE (cellular) | — | No |
| eSIM | — | No |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5.2 |
| Smart features | ||
| Speaker | — | No |
| Platform | ||
| Operating system | — | Proprietary OS |
| Platform | — | Proprietary |
| Works with | iOS, Android | — |
