Dimensions
Size comparison
100102
| 100 | 102 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 114.3 mm | 114.5 mm | −0.2 mm |
| Width | 50 mm | 50 mm | = |
| Thickness | 14.3 mm | 13.7 mm | +0.6 mm |
| Weight | 73 g | 74 g | −1 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is 100 better than 102?
100 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is 102 better than 100?
- Battery capacity800 mAh vs 1,000 mAh+25%
- Thickness14.3 mm vs 13.7 mm+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Weight | 73 g | 74 g |
| Thickness | 14.3 mm | 13.7 mm |
| Height | 114.3 mm | 114.5 mm |
| Width | 50 mm | 50 mm |
| Colours | Gray, Red, Green | Gray, Blue, Red |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1.77″ | 1.77″ |
| Display technology | LCD | LCD |
| Panel | TFT | TFT |
| AMOLED / OLED display | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 128 px | 128 px |
| Resolution (height) | 160 px | 160 px |
| Pixel density | 116 ppi | 116 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 800 mAh | 1,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | Li-Ion |
| Wireless charging | — | No |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Built-in GPS | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| NFC payments | No | No |
| LTE (cellular) | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Smart features | ||
| Speaker | Yes | Yes |
| Platform | ||
| Chipset | Unisoc 6533G | Unisoc SC6531E |
