vs
3.8Display2.8
3.9Smart features3.9
Dimensions
Size comparison
105105 (2022)
| 105 | 105 (2022) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 115.5 mm | 115.2 mm | +0.3 mm |
| Width | 49.5 mm | 49.9 mm | −0.4 mm |
| Thickness | 14 mm | 14.3 mm | −0.3 mm |
| Weight | 78 g | 70 g | +8 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is 105 better than 105 (2022)?
- Screen size2″ vs 1.77″+13%
- Battery capacity1,000 mAh vs 800 mAh+25%
- Thickness14 mm vs 14.3 mm+2%
Why is 105 (2022) better than 105?
- Weight77.5 g vs 70 g+11%
- Pixel density100 ppi vs 113 ppi+13%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Weight | 77.5 g | 70 g |
| Thickness | 14 mm | 14.3 mm |
| Height | 115.5 mm | 115.2 mm |
| Width | 49.5 mm | 49.9 mm |
| Ingress protection | IP54 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | — |
| Colours | Black, Blue, Purple | Blue, Charcoal |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 2″ | 1.77″ |
| Display technology | LCD | LCD |
| Panel | TFT LCD | TFT LCD |
| AMOLED / OLED display | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 120 px | 120 px |
| Resolution (height) | 160 px | 160 px |
| Pixel density | 100 ppi | 113 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 1,000 mAh | 800 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Ion |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Built-in GPS | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| NFC payments | No | No |
| LTE (cellular) | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Smart features | ||
| Speaker | Yes | Yes |
| RAM | 0.004 GB | 0.004 GB |
| Platform | ||
| Operating system | RTOS OS | — |
| Platform | Proprietary | — |
| Chipset | — | Mediatek MT6261D |
