NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. 105 vs GTS 4

HMD 105 vs Zeblaze GTS 4

What 105 does better (2) and where GTS 4 wins (3) — every spec side by side.

HMD 105
HMD · 2024105
4.1Score
2 advantages≈ $20
vs
Zeblaze GTS 4
Zeblaze · 2026GTS 4
9.2Score
3 advantages≈ $25
Higher score
3.8Display9.7
Dimensions

Size comparison

105GTS 4
49.5 × 115.51447 × 478.7
105GTS 4Difference
Case size49.5 mm47 mm+2.5 mm
Thickness14 mm8.7 mm+5.3 mm

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is 105 better than GTS 4?

  1. Battery capacity1,000 mAh vs 260 mAh3.8×
  2. Screen size2″ vs 1.94″+3%

Why is GTS 4 better than 105?

  1. AMOLED / OLED displayNo · 105: Yes
  2. Resolution (width)120 px vs 466 px3.9×
  3. Thickness14 mm vs 8.7 mm+61%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare