vs
6.2Display3.8
3.9Smart features3.9
Dimensions
Size comparison
Choice Watch105 (2024)
| Choice Watch | 105 (2024) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 49.7 mm | 115.5 mm | −65.8 mm |
| Width | 39.9 mm | 49.5 mm | −9.6 mm |
| Thickness | 10.2 mm | 14 mm | −3.8 mm |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Choice Watch better than 105 (2024)?
- Built-in GPSYes · 105 (2024): No
- AMOLED / OLED displayYes · 105 (2024): No
- Resolution (width)410 px vs 120 px3.4×
- Pixel density332 ppi vs 100 ppi3.3×
- Thickness10.2 mm vs 14 mm+37%
Why is 105 (2024) better than Choice Watch?
- Battery capacity300 mAh vs 1,000 mAh3.3×
- Screen size1.95″ vs 2″+3%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Case size | 50 mm | — |
| Weight | — | 77.5 g |
| Thickness | 10.2 mm | 14 mm |
| Height | 49.7 mm | 115.5 mm |
| Width | 39.9 mm | 49.5 mm |
| Case material | Plastic / polymer | — |
| Water resistance | 5 ATM | — |
| Colours | Black, White | Black, Blue, Purple |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1.95″ | 2″ |
| Display technology | AMOLED | LCD |
| Panel | AMOLED | TFT LCD |
| AMOLED / OLED display | Yes | No |
| Resolution (width) | 410 px | 120 px |
| Resolution (height) | 502 px | 160 px |
| Pixel density | 332 ppi | 100 ppi |
| Peak brightness | 550 nits | — |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 300 mAh | 1,000 mAh |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | Yes | — |
| Blood oxygen (SpO2) | Yes | — |
| Sensors | Accelerometer, heart rate, compass, SpO2 | — |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Built-in GPS | Yes | No |
| Satellite systems | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | — |
| Compass | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| NFC payments | No | No |
| LTE (cellular) | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | — |
| Smart features | ||
| Speaker | Yes | Yes |
| RAM | — | 0.004 GB |
| Platform | ||
| Operating system | Proprietary OS | RTOS OS |
| Platform | Proprietary | Proprietary |
