vs
6.2Display7.5
5.0Health tracking5.0
3.9Smart features3.9
Dimensions
Size comparison
Choice WatchBT10
| Choice Watch | BT10 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 49.7 mm | 48.7 mm | +1 mm |
| Width | 39.9 mm | 48.7 mm | −8.8 mm |
| Thickness | 10.2 mm | 12.6 mm | −2.4 mm |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Choice Watch better than BT10?
- Built-in GPSYes · BT10: No
- Screen size1.95″ vs 1.43″+36%
- Thickness10.2 mm vs 12.6 mm+24%
Why is BT10 better than Choice Watch?
- Battery capacity300 mAh vs 410 mAh+37%
- Resolution (width)410 px vs 466 px+14%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Case size | 50 mm | 49 mm |
| Thickness | 10.2 mm | 12.6 mm |
| Height | 49.7 mm | 48.7 mm |
| Width | 39.9 mm | 48.7 mm |
| Case material | Plastic / polymer | — |
| Water resistance | 5 ATM | 5 ATM |
| Ingress protection | — | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx8 |
| Military-grade (MIL-STD-810) | — | Yes |
| Colours | Black, White | Black, Orange |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1.95″ | 1.43″ |
| Display technology | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| AMOLED / OLED display | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 410 px | 466 px |
| Resolution (height) | 502 px | 466 px |
| Pixel density | 332 ppi | 326 ppi |
| Peak brightness | 550 nits | — |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 300 mAh | 410 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Ion |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | Yes | Yes |
| Blood oxygen (SpO2) | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | Accelerometer, heart rate, compass, SpO2 | Accelerometer, heart rate, SpO2 |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Built-in GPS | Yes | No |
| Satellite systems | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | — |
| Compass | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| NFC payments | No | No |
| LTE (cellular) | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | — |
| Smart features | ||
| Speaker | Yes | Yes |
| Platform | ||
| Operating system | Proprietary OS | Proprietary OS |
| Platform | Proprietary | Proprietary |
