vs
9.6Display4.7
Dimensions
Size comparison
Watch 4ICE Smart ST 2.0
| Watch 4 | ICE Smart ST 2.0 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Case size | 39.1 mm | 41 mm | −1.9 mm |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Watch 4 better than ICE Smart ST 2.0?
- Screen size1.75″ vs 1.2″+46%
- Battery capacity451 mAh vs 300 mAh+50%
Why is ICE Smart ST 2.0 better than Watch 4?
ICE Smart ST 2.0 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Case size | 45 mm | 41 mm |
| Weight | 32 g | — |
| Thickness | 11.2 mm | — |
| Height | 45.3 mm | — |
| Width | 39.1 mm | — |
| Case material | Plastic / polymer | — |
| Lens / cover glass | — | Mineralglas |
| Strap material | — | Edelstahl |
| Water resistance | 5 ATM | — |
| Colours | Black, Gold | Roségold |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1.75″ | 1.2″ |
| Display technology | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| AMOLED / OLED display | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 390 px | — |
| Resolution (height) | 450 px | — |
| Pixel density | 340 ppi | — |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 451 mAh | 300 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | — |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | Yes | Yes |
| Blood oxygen (SpO2) | Yes | — |
| Sensors | Accelerometer, gyro, heart rate, SpO2 | heart rate |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Built-in GPS | Yes | — |
| Satellite systems | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | — |
| Dive mode | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| NFC payments | Yes | — |
| LTE (cellular) | Yes | — |
| eSIM | Yes | — |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | — |
| Smart features | ||
| Speaker | Yes | — |
| Storage | 4 GB | — |
| RAM | 0.031 GB | — |
| Platform | ||
| Operating system | MagicOS 7.2 | — |
| Platform | Proprietary | — |
| Works with | — | iOS, Android |
