Dimensions
Size comparison
Watch 42.0 SW033
| Watch 4 | 2.0 SW033 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Case size | 39.1 mm | 45 mm | −5.9 mm |
| Thickness | 11.2 mm | 10.4 mm | +0.8 mm |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Watch 4 better than 2.0 SW033?
- AMOLED / OLED displayYes · 2.0 SW033: No
- Battery capacity451 mAh vs 200 mAh2.3×
- Screen size1.75″ vs 1.7″+3%
- Resolution (width)390 px vs 240 px+62%
Why is 2.0 SW033 better than Watch 4?
- Thickness11.2 mm vs 10.4 mm+8%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Case size | 45 mm | 45 mm |
| Weight | 32 g | — |
| Thickness | 11.2 mm | 10.4 mm |
| Height | 45.3 mm | — |
| Width | 39.1 mm | — |
| Case material | Plastic / polymer | — |
| Lens / cover glass | — | Mineralglas |
| Water resistance | 5 ATM | — |
| Colours | Black, Gold | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1.75″ | 1.7″ |
| Display technology | AMOLED | — |
| Panel | AMOLED | — |
| AMOLED / OLED display | Yes | No |
| Resolution (width) | 390 px | 240 px |
| Resolution (height) | 450 px | 280 px |
| Pixel density | 340 ppi | — |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery life (smartwatch mode) | — | 5 days |
| Battery capacity | 451 mAh | 200 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | Li-Ion |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | Yes | Yes |
| Blood oxygen (SpO2) | Yes | Yes |
| Sleep tracking | — | Yes |
| Sensors | Accelerometer, gyro, heart rate, SpO2 | heart rate, SpO2, accelerometer |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Built-in GPS | Yes | — |
| Satellite systems | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| NFC payments | Yes | — |
| LTE (cellular) | Yes | — |
| eSIM | Yes | — |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.1 |
| Smart features | ||
| Speaker | Yes | — |
| Storage | 4 GB | — |
| RAM | 0.031 GB | — |
| Platform | ||
| Operating system | MagicOS 7.2 | — |
| Platform | Proprietary | — |
| Works with | — | iOS |
