Dimensions
Size comparison
Watch ESWatch GT
| Watch ES | Watch GT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 46 mm | 47.8 mm | −1.8 mm |
| Width | 30 mm | 46.4 mm | −16.4 mm |
| Thickness | 12.3 mm | 12.4 mm | −0.1 mm |
| Weight | 21 g | 30 g | −9 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Watch ES better than Watch GT?
- Weight21 g vs 30 g+43%
- Screen size1.64″ vs 1.39″+18%
Why is Watch GT better than Watch ES?
- Battery capacity180 mAh vs 420 mAh2.3×
- Resolution (width)280 px vs 454 px+62%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Case size | 46 mm | 48 mm |
| Weight | 21 g | 30 g |
| Thickness | 12.3 mm | 12.4 mm |
| Height | 46 mm | 47.8 mm |
| Width | 30 mm | 46.4 mm |
| Case material | Plastic / polymer | Aluminium |
| Water resistance | 5 ATM | 5 ATM |
| Ingress protection | — | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx8 |
| Colours | Meteorite Black, Coral Pink, Icelandic White | Silver |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1.64″ | 1.39″ |
| Display technology | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| AMOLED / OLED display | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 280 px | 454 px |
| Resolution (height) | 456 px | 454 px |
| Pixel density | 326 ppi | 326 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 180 mAh | 420 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | Li-Ion |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | Yes | Yes |
| Blood oxygen (SpO2) | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | Accelerometer, gyro, heart rate, SpO2 | Accelerometer, heart rate, SpO2 |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Built-in GPS | Yes | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| NFC payments | No | No |
| LTE (cellular) | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Bluetooth | 5 | — |
| Smart features | ||
| Speaker | No | No |
| Storage | 4 GB | — |
| Platform | ||
| Operating system | Proprietary OS | Proprietary OS |
| Platform | Proprietary | Proprietary |
