vs
8.3Display8.7
5.0Health tracking5.0
Why is Watch X5 better than Smart SQ 2.0 1.70?
- Weight29 g vs 160 g5.5×
- Screen size1.97″ vs 1.7″+16%
- Battery capacity360 mAh vs 210 mAh+71%
Why is Smart SQ 2.0 1.70 better than Watch X5?
Smart SQ 2.0 1.70 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Case size | 46 mm | — |
| Weight | 29 g | 160 g |
| Thickness | 10 mm | — |
| Height | 45.7 mm | — |
| Width | 40.2 mm | — |
| Case material | Aluminium | — |
| Strap material | — | Edelstahl |
| Water resistance | 5 ATM | — |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | — |
| Colours | Black, White | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1.97″ | 1.7″ |
| Display technology | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| AMOLED / OLED display | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 390 px | — |
| Resolution (height) | 450 px | — |
| Pixel density | 302 ppi | — |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 360 mAh | 210 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | Li-Ion |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | Yes | Yes |
| Blood oxygen (SpO2) | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | Accelerometer, gyro, barometer, compass, heart rate, SpO2 | heart rate, SpO2 |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Built-in GPS | Yes | — |
| Satellite systems | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | — |
| Barometric altimeter | Yes | — |
| Compass | Yes | — |
| Multisport / triathlon mode | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| NFC payments | Yes | — |
| LTE (cellular) | No | — |
| eSIM | No | — |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | — |
| Smart features | ||
| Speaker | Yes | — |
| Platform | ||
| Operating system | Proprietary OS | — |
| Platform | Proprietary | — |
| Works with | — | iOS, Android |
