Why is Band 8 better than Fit 1.0?
- Battery life (smartwatch mode)14 days vs 5 days2.8×
- Water resistance5 ATM vs 3 ATM+67%
- Thickness9 mm vs 12 mm+33%
Why is Fit 1.0 better than Band 8?
- Screen size1.47″ vs 1.78″+21%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Case size | 25 mm | — |
| Weight | 14 g | — |
| Thickness | 9 mm | 12 mm |
| Case material | Plastic / polymer | Aluminium |
| Lens / cover glass | 2.5D-Glas | Mineralglas Mineralglas |
| Strap material | — | Silikon |
| Water resistance | 5 ATM | 3 ATM |
| Water rating (maker) | 50 m / 5 bar / 5 ATM | 30 m / 3 bar / 3 ATM |
| Colours | — | Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1.47″ | 1.78″ |
| Display technology | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| AMOLED / OLED display | Yes | Yes |
| Touchscreen | Yes | — |
| Resolution (width) | 368 px | 368 px |
| Resolution (height) | 194 px | 448 px |
| Battery | ||
| Battery life (smartwatch mode) | 14 days | 5 days |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | Yes | Yes |
| Blood oxygen (SpO2) | Yes | Yes |
| Sleep tracking | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | heart rate, SpO2, accelerometer | heart rate, SpO2, accelerometer |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Built-in GPS | — | Yes |
| Satellite systems | — | GPS |
| Connectivity | ||
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5 |
| Platform | ||
| Operating system | — | Proprietär |
| Platform | — | Proprietary |
| Works with | Android, iOS | iOS, Android |
