Why is Band 9 better than Fit 1.0?
- Battery life (smartwatch mode)14 days vs 5 days2.8×
- Water resistance5 ATM vs 3 ATM+67%
- Thickness9 mm vs 12 mm+33%
Why is Fit 1.0 better than Band 9?
- Screen size1.47″ vs 1.78″+21%
- Resolution (width)194 px vs 368 px+90%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Case size | 25 mm | — |
| Weight | 23 g | — |
| Thickness | 9 mm | 12 mm |
| Height | 43.4 mm | — |
| Width | 24.9 mm | — |
| Case material | — | Aluminium |
| Lens / cover glass | — | Mineralglas Mineralglas |
| Strap material | — | Silikon |
| Water resistance | 5 ATM | 3 ATM |
| Water rating (maker) | — | 30 m / 3 bar / 3 ATM |
| Colours | — | Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1.47″ | 1.78″ |
| Display technology | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| AMOLED / OLED display | Yes | Yes |
| Always-on display | Yes | — |
| Touchscreen | Yes | — |
| Resolution (width) | 194 px | 368 px |
| Resolution (height) | 368 px | 448 px |
| Battery | ||
| Battery life (smartwatch mode) | 14 days | 5 days |
| Battery capacity | 180 mAh | — |
| Battery type | Li-Po | — |
| Wireless charging | Yes | — |
| Charging | kabellos, magnetische Ladeschale | — |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | Yes | Yes |
| Blood oxygen (SpO2) | Yes | Yes |
| Sleep tracking | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | heart rate, accelerometer, ambient light | heart rate, SpO2, accelerometer |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Built-in GPS | — | Yes |
| Satellite systems | — | GPS |
| Compass | Yes | — |
| Multisport / triathlon mode | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5 |
| Platform | ||
| Operating system | — | Proprietär |
| Platform | — | Proprietary |
| Works with | iOS, Android | iOS, Android |
