Dimensions
Size comparison
Band 9FW34
| Band 9 | FW34 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 43.4 mm | 43 mm | +0.5 mm |
| Width | 24.9 mm | 23 mm | +1.9 mm |
| Thickness | 9 mm | 11 mm | −2 mm |
| Weight | 23 g | 24 g | −1 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Band 9 better than FW34?
- AMOLED / OLED displayYes · FW34: No
- Screen size1.47″ vs 1.08″+36%
- Battery capacity180 mAh vs 105 mAh+71%
- Weight23 g vs 24 g+4%
- Thickness9 mm vs 11 mm+22%
Why is FW34 better than Band 9?
FW34 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Case size | 25 mm | — |
| Weight | 23 g | 24 g |
| Thickness | 9 mm | 11 mm |
| Height | 43.4 mm | 43 mm |
| Width | 24.9 mm | 23 mm |
| Case material | — | Aluminium |
| Water resistance | 5 ATM | — |
| Water rating (maker) | — | 1 m |
| Colours | — | Silver |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1.47″ | 1.08″ |
| Display technology | AMOLED | LCD |
| Panel | AMOLED | TFT |
| AMOLED / OLED display | Yes | No |
| Always-on display | Yes | — |
| Touchscreen | Yes | — |
| Resolution (width) | 194 px | — |
| Resolution (height) | 368 px | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery life (smartwatch mode) | 14 days | — |
| Battery capacity | 180 mAh | 105 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | — |
| Wireless charging | Yes | — |
| Charging | kabellos, magnetische Ladeschale | — |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | Yes | Yes |
| Blood oxygen (SpO2) | Yes | Yes |
| Sleep tracking | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | heart rate, accelerometer, ambient light | heart rate, SpO2 |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Compass | Yes | — |
| Multisport / triathlon mode | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Bluetooth | 5 | 4 |
| Platform | ||
| Works with | iOS, Android | — |
