vs
7.5Display9.1
5.0Health tracking8.6
6.4Sports & outdoor6.4
5.7Smart features7.9
5.6Build & durability4.6
Dimensions
Size comparison
Watch GT RunnerGalaxy Watch6 Classic
| Watch GT Runner | Galaxy Watch6 Classic | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 46.4 mm | 46.5 mm | −0.1 mm |
| Width | 46.4 mm | 46.5 mm | −0.1 mm |
| Thickness | 11 mm | 10.9 mm | +0.1 mm |
| Weight | 38 g | 59 g | −20 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Watch GT Runner better than Galaxy Watch6 Classic?
- Weight38.5 g vs 59 g+53%
- Battery capacity455 mAh vs 425 mAh+7%
Why is Galaxy Watch6 Classic better than Watch GT Runner?
- LTE (cellular)No · Watch GT Runner: Yes
- Storage4 GB vs 16 GB4×
- eSIMNo · Watch GT Runner: Yes
- Screen size1.43″ vs 1.5″+5%
- Pixel density326 ppi vs 453 ppi+39%
- Resolution (width)466 px vs 480 px+3%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Case size | 46 mm | 46 mm |
| Weight | 38.5 g | 59 g |
| Thickness | 11 mm | 10.9 mm |
| Height | 46.4 mm | 46.5 mm |
| Width | 46.4 mm | 46.5 mm |
| Case material | Plastic / polymer | Stainless steel |
| Sapphire crystal | — | Yes |
| Lens / cover glass | — | Sapphire crystal |
| Strap material | Silikon | — |
| Water resistance | 5 ATM | 5 ATM |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Water rating (maker) | 50 m / 5 ATM | 50 m / 5 bar / 5 ATM |
| Military-grade (MIL-STD-810) | — | Yes |
| Colours | Black, Gray | Black, Silver |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1.43″ | 1.5″ |
| Display technology | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Panel | AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| AMOLED / OLED display | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 466 px | 480 px |
| Resolution (height) | 466 px | 480 px |
| Pixel density | 326 ppi | 453 ppi |
| Peak brightness | — | 2,000 nits |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Battery | ||
| Battery life (smartwatch mode) | 14 days | — |
| Battery capacity | 455 mAh | 425 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Ion |
| Wireless charging | Yes | Yes |
| Charging | — | kabellos, Schnellladefunktion, magnetisches Ladekabel |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | Yes | Yes |
| Blood oxygen (SpO2) | Yes | Yes |
| ECG | — | Yes |
| Skin temperature | — | Yes |
| Temperature sensor | — | Yes |
| Sleep tracking | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | Accelerometer, gyro, heart rate, barometer, compass, SpO2 | Accelerometer, gyro, heart rate, barometer, altimeter, compass, SpO2, temperature (skin) |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Built-in GPS | Yes | Yes |
| Satellite systems | GLONASS, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Barometric altimeter | Yes | Yes |
| Compass | Yes | Yes |
| Multisport / triathlon mode | Yes | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| NFC payments | Yes | Yes |
| LTE (cellular) | No | Yes |
| eSIM | No | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | — | Wi-Fi 4 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.3 |
| Smart features | ||
| Calls from the wrist | — | Yes |
| Speaker | Yes | Yes |
| Voice assistant | — | Yes |
| Music on the watch | Yes | Yes |
| Storage | 4 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM | — | 2 GB |
| Platform | ||
| Operating system | HarmonyOS 2.0 | Android Wear OS 4 |
| Platform | HarmonyOS | Android |
| Works with | iOS | Android |
| Chipset | — | Exynos W930 |
Related comparisons
vs
Google Pixel WatchvsHuawei Watch GT Runner7.27.4vs
Huawei Watch GT RunnervsXiaomi Watch S17.47.2vs
Huawei Watch GT RunnervsHuawei Watch 3 Pro7.47.6
vsGarmin Venu Sq 2 Music EditionvsHuawei Watch GT Runner7.37.4vs
Huawei Watch GT RunnervsAsus VivoWatch SP7.46.7vs
Huawei Watch GT RunnervsApple Watch Nike SE