vs
7.9Display4.7
Dimensions
Size comparison
ICE smart SQ 2.0 SmartwatchSmart 3.0 rund
| ICE smart SQ 2.0 Smartwatch | Smart 3.0 rund | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Case size | 37 mm | 42 mm | −5 mm |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is ICE smart SQ 2.0 Smartwatch better than Smart 3.0 rund?
- Screen size1.7″ vs 1.2″+42%
Why is Smart 3.0 rund better than ICE smart SQ 2.0 Smartwatch?
Smart 3.0 rund has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Case size | 37 mm | 42 mm |
| Thickness | — | 10.5 mm |
| Case material | Plastic / polymer | Stainless steel |
| Lens / cover glass | — | Mineralglas Mineralglas |
| Strap material | — | Silikon |
| Water resistance | — | 3 ATM |
| Water rating (maker) | — | 30 m / 3 bar / 3 ATM |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1.7″ | 1.2″ |
| Display technology | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| AMOLED / OLED display | Yes | Yes |
| Touchscreen | Yes | — |
| Resolution (width) | — | 390 px |
| Resolution (height) | — | 390 px |
| Battery | ||
| Battery life (smartwatch mode) | — | 3 days |
| Battery capacity | 380 mAh | — |
| Battery type | Li-Po | — |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | Yes | Yes |
| Blood oxygen (SpO2) | — | Yes |
| Sleep tracking | — | Yes |
| Sensors | — | heart rate, SpO2, accelerometer |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Built-in GPS | — | Yes |
| Satellite systems | — | GPS |
| Dive mode | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5 |
| Platform | ||
| Operating system | — | Proprietär |
| Platform | — | Proprietary |
| Works with | iOS, Android | iOS, Android |
Related comparisons
vs
Motorola Moto WatchvsIce Watch ICE smart SQ 2.0 Smartwatch
vs
OnePlus Watch 4vsIce Watch ICE smart SQ 2.0 Smartwatch
vs
Vivo Watch GT 2vsIce Watch ICE smart SQ 2.0 Smartwatch
vs
Amazfit Bip MaxvsIce Watch ICE smart SQ 2.0 Smartwatch
vs
Amazfit Bip 6vsIce Watch ICE smart SQ 2.0 Smartwatch
vs
Xiaomi Redmi Watch 6 LitevsIce Watch ICE smart SQ 2.0 Smartwatch

