vs
8.0Display8.8
Why is ICE smart SQ 2.0 Smartwatch better than Smart SQ 2.0 1.70?
- Battery capacity380 mAh vs 210 mAh+81%
Why is Smart SQ 2.0 1.70 better than ICE smart SQ 2.0 Smartwatch?
Smart SQ 2.0 1.70 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Case size | 37 mm | — |
| Weight | — | 160 g |
| Case material | Plastic / polymer | — |
| Strap material | — | Edelstahl |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1.7″ | 1.7″ |
| Display technology | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| AMOLED / OLED display | Yes | Yes |
| Touchscreen | Yes | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 380 mAh | 210 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Ion |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | Yes | Yes |
| Blood oxygen (SpO2) | — | Yes |
| Sensors | — | heart rate, SpO2 |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Multisport / triathlon mode | — | Yes |
| Dive mode | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | — |
| Platform | ||
| Works with | iOS, Android | iOS, Android |
Related comparisons
vs
Garett Prime Smartwatch Herren, Edelstahl, Gorilla GlassvsIce Watch ICE smart SQ 2.0 Smartwatch
vsHonor Watch GS 5vsIce Watch ICE smart SQ 2.0 Smartwatch
vsCubot GT5vsIce Watch ICE smart SQ 2.0 Smartwatch
vsHMD Watch X1vsIce Watch ICE smart SQ 2.0 Smartwatch
vs
Xiaomi Redmi Watch 6vsIce Watch Smart SQ 2.0 1.708.48.6vs
Ice Watch Smart SQ 2.0 1.70vsVivo Watch 58.68.6