vs
4.7Display4.6
Dimensions
Size comparison
ICE Smart ST 2.0BT50
| ICE Smart ST 2.0 | BT50 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Case size | 41 mm | 51.2 mm | −10.2 mm |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is ICE Smart ST 2.0 better than BT50?
ICE Smart ST 2.0 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is BT50 better than ICE Smart ST 2.0?
- Screen size1.2″ vs 1.43″+19%
- Battery capacity300 mAh vs 400 mAh+33%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Case size | 41 mm | 51 mm |
| Weight | — | 76 g |
| Thickness | — | 13 mm |
| Height | — | 51.2 mm |
| Width | — | 51.2 mm |
| Lens / cover glass | Mineralglas | — |
| Strap material | Edelstahl | — |
| Water resistance | — | 1 ATM |
| Ingress protection | — | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx8 |
| Colours | Roségold | Silver, Gray |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1.2″ | 1.43″ |
| Display technology | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| AMOLED / OLED display | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | — | 466 px |
| Resolution (height) | — | 466 px |
| Pixel density | — | 326 ppi |
| Peak brightness | — | 600 nits |
| Refresh rate | — | 60 Hz |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 300 mAh | 400 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Po |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | Yes | Yes |
| Blood oxygen (SpO2) | — | Yes |
| Sensors | heart rate | Accelerometer, heart rate, SpO2 |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Built-in GPS | — | No |
| Dive mode | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| NFC payments | — | No |
| LTE (cellular) | — | No |
| eSIM | — | No |
| Bluetooth | — | 5.2 |
| Smart features | ||
| Speaker | — | Yes |
| Platform | ||
| Operating system | — | Proprietary OS |
| Platform | — | Proprietary |
| Works with | iOS, Android | — |
