vs
8.7Display8.7
5.0Health tracking5.0
Why is smart 2.0 1.78 better than Smart SQ 2.0 1.70?
smart 2.0 1.78 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is Smart SQ 2.0 1.70 better than smart 2.0 1.78?
Smart SQ 2.0 1.70 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Weight | — | 160 g |
| Case material | Stainless steel | — |
| Lens / cover glass | Mineralglas Mineralglas | — |
| Strap material | — | Edelstahl |
| Water resistance | 5 ATM | — |
| Water rating (maker) | 50 m / 5 bar / 5 ATM | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1.7″ | 1.7″ |
| Display technology | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| AMOLED / OLED display | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | — | 210 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Ion |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | Yes | Yes |
| Blood oxygen (SpO2) | Yes | Yes |
| ECG | Yes | — |
| Sleep tracking | Yes | — |
| Sensors | heart rate, SpO2, accelerometer | heart rate, SpO2 |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Multisport / triathlon mode | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| Bluetooth | 5 | — |
| Platform | ||
| Works with | iOS, Android | iOS, Android |
Related comparisons
vs
Samsung Galaxy Watch FEvsIce Watch smart 2.0 1.788.38.5
vsXiaomi Redmi Watch 6vsIce Watch smart 2.0 1.788.48.5
vsJoyroom Smartwatch JR-FV1vsIce Watch smart 2.0 1.789.78.5
vsAmazfit Active 2 (Round)vsIce Watch smart 2.0 1.788.68.5
vsHonor Watch X5vsIce Watch smart 2.0 1.788.38.5vs
Ice Watch smart 2.0 1.78vsXiaomi Smart Band 9 Pro8.58.8